Science Over Politics? I Think Not.
Barack Obama picked Steven Chu for energy secretary. Chu is a winner of the Nobel Price for Physics in 1997 (although after this decision, I don’t know how impressed we should be with that). Steven Chu is hailed as the beginning of a new era: he’s a scientist, not a politician. Unfortunately, he’s a scientist who is an avid Global Warming believer, and as such is to be sure to implement Obama/Gore’s Climate Change policies.
In the announcement, Obama said:
“…send a signal to all that my administration will value science, make decisions based on facts and understand that facts require bold action”
See, the “bold action” in the quote above refers to Climate Change, and if something has nothing to do with science (or facts for that matter) and everything to do with politics, it’s Climate Change (formerly: Global Warming). GW is a movement based entirely upon junk science, incomplete computer models and incredibly inaccurate temperature readings.
In other words, Chu’s appointment has nothing to do with science or facts, and everything to do with being able to implement Obama’s Climate Change (formerly: Global Warming) polices swiftly, and without rebuttal. Policies that are written by Al Gore, a POLITICIAN and certainly NOT a scientist.
Does that sound like science over politics to you?

Copyright 2010 ERWIN GERRITS. All Rights Reserved.