<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>erwingerrits.com &#187; Ignatieff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erwingerrits.com/tag/ignatieff/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com</link>
	<description>The eyes are open, the mouth moves, but Mr. Brain has long since departed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So it&#8217;s the Rainbow Door, then?</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2011/04/20/so-its-the-rainbow-door-then</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2011/04/20/so-its-the-rainbow-door-then#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=8332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>All of a sudden, Iggy pulls out the Coalition Option. Layton said last week he's willing to jump into bed with anybody (my words, not his). Seems like Harper was the only one telling the truth all along. Surprise, surprise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2011%2F04%2F20%2Fso-its-the-rainbow-door-then"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2011%2F04%2F20%2Fso-its-the-rainbow-door-then&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://www.erwingerrits.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/coalition.png" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[g8332]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-7540 alignright" title="coalition" src="http://www.erwingerrits.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/coalition-212x300.png" alt="" width="212" height="300" /></a>All of a sudden, Iggy pulls out the <a href="http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/04/20/kelly-mcparland-michael-ignatieff-pulls-a-coalition-out-of-his-hat/">Coalition Option</a>. Layton said last week he&#8217;s willing to jump into bed with anybody (my words, not his). Seems like Harper was the only one telling the truth all along. Surprise, surprise.</p>
<p>Iggy now says he&#8217;s ruling out any form of coalition, unless there&#8217;s a Harper minority. Wait, what? If there was a Harper majority, there&#8217;s obviously no reason to form a coalition. And the Harper minority is the only reason you could form a coalition. So what you&#8217;re really saying is, is that you&#8217;re going to form a coalition. Period.</p>
<p>If this isn&#8217;t reason enough to elect a majority Harper government, I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2011/04/20/so-its-the-rainbow-door-then/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A little of the ol&#8217; In and Out &#8212; #elxn41 &#8211; Day 5</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2011/03/31/a-little-of-the-ol-in-and-out-elxn41-day-5</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2011/03/31/a-little-of-the-ol-in-and-out-elxn41-day-5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elxn41]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=7986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>So, the campaign promises have started. Already the collective Opposition leaders have promised about $1B per day. Where this money comes from no one knows, but hey, it's a campaign, and Canadians have been known to believe a promise or two (remember the GST?).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2011%2F03%2F31%2Fa-little-of-the-ol-in-and-out-elxn41-day-5"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2011%2F03%2F31%2Fa-little-of-the-ol-in-and-out-elxn41-day-5&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>So, the campaign promises have started. Already the collective Opposition leaders have promised about $1B per day. Where this money comes from no one knows, but hey, it&#8217;s a campaign, and Canadians have been known to believe a promise or two (remember the GST?).</p>
<p>After attaching the government on the so called &#8220;in and out&#8221; scheme, both Iggy and Jackie  themselves are offering a sort of in-and-out scheme to the taxpayers. Yesterday Iggy came up with the most <a href="http://www2.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/news/story.html?id=4523966">complicated, convoluted scheme</a> to &#8220;help&#8221; students with some sort of $4000 (or something) grant in some sort of program (if I am being vague, well, it&#8217;s because no-one understands the damn thing). One university professor (didn&#8217;t catch his name) said on the radio yesterday, that, while complicated, it basically means nothing more than taking something away from some students and giving it to other students, using programs already in place (like the RESPs), the net result being zero. In and out.</p>
<p>Today Jackie came out swinging saying he&#8217;d <a href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Reality+Check+takes+small+business+owners/4531569/story.html">lower taxes for small business</a>, but to pay for it, he&#8217;d raise taxes on corporations. I guess no-one told him that most small businesses are corporations, providing most of the jobs (at least here in Ontario). You know that nail-salon you go to, next to the Lebanese pizza place? Well, both of them are corporations. And so are all the other small businesses in that strip mall. They will get a lower tax through his small business cuts, and then pay more tax through his corporation raise. Sounds a lot like an in-and-out scheme to me.</p>
<p>Lizzy May is talking to a lawyer so she may, once again, <a href="http://www.erwingerrits.com/2008/10/09/election-2008-day-what-28">act like a spoiled child</a> and scream through everybody around the discussion table at the National Debates (that are somehow directed by &#8220;The Broadcast Consortium&#8221;, a term one only hears during electoral debates, thankfully).</p>
<p>And Gilles? Well, Gilles is in Quebec. Big surprise.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2011/03/31/a-little-of-the-ol-in-and-out-elxn41-day-5/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your password might as well be &#8220;password&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2010/10/15/your-password-might-as-well-be-password</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2010/10/15/your-password-might-as-well-be-password#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=1882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>If you are currently using an 8 character (or less) password than you really have no security at all. With today's cheap and fast computing power, a skilled hacker can crack an 8 character password in under two hours.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2010%2F10%2F15%2Fyour-password-might-as-well-be-password"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2010%2F10%2F15%2Fyour-password-might-as-well-be-password&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://www.erwingerrits.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/password_star1.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[g1882]"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1883" title="password_star1" src="http://www.erwingerrits.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/password_star1-150x150.jpg" alt="password_star1" width="150" height="150" /></a>If you are currently using an 8 character (or less) password than you really have no security at all. With today&#8217;s cheap and fast computing power, a skilled hacker can crack an 8 character password in under two hours. And it doesn&#8217;t matter if your password is &#8220;H%gd1f4&amp;&#8221; or &#8220;password&#8221;. Today&#8217;s fast computers will iterate through all possibilities, from AAAAAAAA to zzzzzzzz (or for you computer geeks: from !!!!!!!! to ~~~~~~~~) and everything in between, in under two hours.</p>
<p>For now, it is best to switch to a 12 character password. Using current computer power would take about 17,000 years to crack. However, computer speed continuously increases, so that number is shrinking by the day.</p>
<p>So what to do? Experts say that thinking of a &#8220;pass-phrase&#8221; rather than a &#8220;password&#8221; would be better: think of a phrase like &#8220;The Capital Of Canada Is Not Beavertown!&#8221; or &#8220;My son&#8217;s name is not Sally&#8221; or even &#8220;Count Iggy is Not a Canadian&#8221;. Of course, there are still a large number of online businesses and even banks that do not allow passwords longer than 8 characters. This will have to change soon, so you better get ready memorizing that new pass-phrase!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/innovation/08/20/super.passwords/">link</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2010/10/15/your-password-might-as-well-be-password/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m flippin&#8217;, I&#8217;m floppin&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/04/20/im-flippin-im-floppin</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/04/20/im-flippin-im-floppin#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2009%2F04%2F20%2Fim-flippin-im-floppin"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2009%2F04%2F20%2Fim-flippin-im-floppin&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Funny how the current deficit budget is now universally referred to as &#8220;The Conservative Deficit&#8221;, even after this current budget was forced upon us by the Liberals, NDPers and the bloc-heads after a mid-winter stand-off on the Governour General&#8217;s front stoop. As I recall, the Conservative&#8217;s Economic Update, brought forward in December, did not make us go into a deficit at all. It was after the three stooges reared their ugly heads and blackmailed the country, that the current deficit budget was tabled. In fact, the Libs and Dippers were crying foul that the $30B <strong>wasn&#8217;t enough</strong>.</p>
<p>So now it&#8217;s the &#8220;Conservative Deficit&#8221; eh? And as usual, Canadians just happily go along with it. After all, we Canadians like to hear what we want to hear and will go along with <a href="http://www.bluelikeyou.com/2009/04/03/iggy-walks-right-off-a-cliff-into-a-lie/">whomever says it at the time</a>. Eventhough at another time he may say something <a href="http://www.bluelikeyou.com/2009/04/15/michael-ignatieff-serial-flip-flopping-puffinocchio/">completely different</a>.</p>
<p>First they had <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/02/17/martin-dithers-050217.html">Mr. Dithers</a>, then they had <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNUo9JXtvC4&amp;feature=related">The Dion-Witch Project</a>, now they&#8217;re stuck with <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090415.wtax0416/BNStory/National/home">Mr. Flip-Flop</a>. Those Libs just can&#8217;t get their act togther, can they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/04/20/im-flippin-im-floppin/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EYEBROW ALERT</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/02/04/eyebrow-alert</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/02/04/eyebrow-alert#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2009%2F02%2F04%2Feyebrow-alert"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2009%2F02%2F04%2Feyebrow-alert&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">EYEBROW ALERT</span></strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>If you caught <a href="http://esi.ctv.ca/datafeed/urlgen2.aspx?vid=136094">Iggy&#8217;s media scrum yesterday</a> concerning allowing the six Newfoundland MPs to vote against the <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Liberal Party</span> the budget, maybe you have noticed how Iggy&#8217;s eyebrows (you can&#8217;t miss &#8216;em: they&#8217;re right above his eyes) tend to go up when he says something he does not agree with. They are perched right over his eyes most of the time, and once in a while they&#8217;ll move upwards.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to keep my eye on them—as disturbing as that may sound—I think Iggy&#8217;s eyebrows are a tell-tale as to his true feelings. Some people have a tic, or a hand gesture, but I think Iggy&#8217;s eyebrows are the window to his soul. I think they are down when he&#8217;s speaking the truth, and they go up as he is straying away from the truth, be it a lie or something he has to do he does not agree with.</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve got an eyebrow project and I will be issuing EYEBROW ALERTs in the future when necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/02/04/eyebrow-alert/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://esi.ctv.ca/datafeed/urlgen2.aspx?vid=136094" length="608" type="video/x-ms-asf-plugin;" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Thinker to Listener to Stinker</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/01/19/from-thinker-to-listener-to-stinker</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/01/19/from-thinker-to-listener-to-stinker#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2009%2F01%2F19%2Ffrom-thinker-to-listener-to-stinker"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2009%2F01%2F19%2Ffrom-thinker-to-listener-to-stinker&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>(Squ)Iggy&#8217;s been successful in his transition from <a href="http://www.economist.com/world/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12775607">Thinker</a> to <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/scripts/story.html?id=1154462">Listener</a> to <a href="http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2009/01/19/8067481-sun.html">Stinker</a>. Last year, the Libs were crying for stimulus packages, and saying &#8220;doing nothing&#8221; was not an option. Over Christmas, Harper was forced to adjust his budget, provide a stimulus package and do &#8220;something&#8221;, and now Iggy says $40B is too much. More stimulus, less stimulus. I mean, <a href="http://dustmybroom.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=10812:liberal-leader-michael-ignatieff-i-was-for-tax-cuts-before-i-was-against-them&amp;catid=42:politics">make up your mind</a>!</p>
<p>Maybe Iggy should devote his time on learning how to properly <a href="http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/01/19/8075406.html">get a car out of the ditch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/01/19/from-thinker-to-listener-to-stinker/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thought Thoughts vs Intellectual Intellect</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/01/04/thought-thinking-vs-intellectual-intellect</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/01/04/thought-thinking-vs-intellectual-intellect#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2009%2F01%2F04%2Fthought-thinking-vs-intellectual-intellect"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2009%2F01%2F04%2Fthought-thinking-vs-intellectual-intellect&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>All Hail The President-Elect! He has surrounded Himself with an <a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Sports/There+things+look+forward+2009/1140087/story.html">intellectual team other countries dare not dream of</a>! In fact, according to Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen columnist, Canada does not have what it takes&#8211;and never will&#8211;but perhaps Harper could look at Ignatieff, our Greatest Thinker, for some &#8220;thinking&#8221; inspiration. If &#8220;<a href="http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=519">Determined Determination</a>&#8221; is a sign of things to come, hold on to your hats folks, there will be some eye-poppin&#8217; thinkin&#8217; comin&#8217; from that Hill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2009/01/04/thought-thinking-vs-intellectual-intellect/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iggy &amp; the Stooges</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2008/12/10/iggy-the-stooges</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2008/12/10/iggy-the-stooges#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2008%2F12%2F10%2Figgy-the-stooges"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2008%2F12%2F10%2Figgy-the-stooges&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-517" title="iggystooges" src="http://www.erwingerrits.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/iggystooges.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="317" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2008/12/10/iggy-the-stooges/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I want my welfare&#8221; (formerly: &#8220;we need to work together&#8221;)</title>
		<link>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2008/11/28/i-want-my-welfare-formerly-we-need-to-work-together</link>
		<comments>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2008/11/28/i-want-my-welfare-formerly-we-need-to-work-together#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2008%2F11%2F28%2Fi-want-my-welfare-formerly-we-need-to-work-together"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.erwingerrits.com%2F2008%2F11%2F28%2Fi-want-my-welfare-formerly-we-need-to-work-together&amp;source=erwingerrits&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The country is facing a recession, people of all stripes are cutting back on their expenses, some are losing money on their RRSPs, gauging (more like fleecing) at the pumps, people are losing jobs left and right, yet the Liberals, NDP and Bloc are against capping their salaries, cutting their expense accounts and want to hold on to their entitlements.  &#8220;We must work together to make this parliament work for the Canadian people&#8221; has changed to &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to give up my $1.95 per vote and a pay hike&#8221;. Thanks Jackie, Stephane and Gilles. Glad you&#8217;re working for us. Glad you&#8217;re chippin&#8217; in.<br />
<span id="more-452"></span><br />
Now it&#8217;s either another election with Mr. Money vs Mr. Broke, Mr. Poor and Mr. Stupid, or a coalition government between Mr. Am I Prime Minister now or Tuesday?, Mr. Kitchen Table and Mr. Separatist. Lovely.</p>
<p>These people live in such lala-land it is unbelievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erwingerrits.com/2008/11/28/i-want-my-welfare-formerly-we-need-to-work-together/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

